This suggests that in the film their will be a relaxed atmosphere and will not have overpowering vigilante justice. Two specific characters that were portrayed very differently and are my favorite characters are Tybalt and Mercutio. How ever we can defiantly see that that the movie will be relaxed, slow and claim and certainly romantic the movie is intended for a upper class society and that perhaps would be because the rich would of only been able to afford to attend the cinema regularly.
A dog of the house of Montague moves me 1. They both appeal to their target audiences. Nay, as they dare. This mini-essay will discuss the different elements in fiction for each movie and will conclude with an overall rating of the movies.
To distinguish between the two families the Montagues are dressed very casually with baggy trousers loose Hawaiian shirts and spiky haircuts. The music has finally stopped at this point but soon starts again and gets louder as Romeo finds out about the fight increasing the drama.
A few characters were the same; the nurse was always silly and made inappropriate jokes at time, and Romeo was always so impulsive.
The main themes of the play was tragedy and love. Characters were in both movies for it is an essential element in fiction. Tybalt is also portrayed differently in the films.
And also will be the traditional re-enactment of William Shakespeare play. I can conclude, from the images, that Baz Lurhamans version of Romeo and Juilet will be full of suspense, thriller and action. In the text, the characters all fight with swords, on a stage empty of all but citizens of the watch.
In Franco Zeffirelli version of Romeo and Juliet begins with a soft light colour background with a wide Birdseye camera shot across the city which pans across the screen. The Montagues in this are being portrayed as cowardly in this as well, but when Tybalt enters he questions what Benvolio is doing which makes Benvolio scared to a certain point.
It is very violent and has problems with prostitution etc. Both versions show the gentleness of Romeo and how he is different compared to the Montagues that we see before with the use of soft focus when first seeing Romeo. The car drives towards the camera again and stops just before it can run it over which is then followed straight after by a door opening.
The music itself is preformed by a medieval instrument creates the idea of that the film will be set in the medieval period jet suggesting one more time that the film is traditional and is for the upper class society.
Luhrmann tried to update it by using guns in the place of swords. Do you bite your thumb at us, sir.
Leonardo DiCaprio and Claire Danes. Shakespearean drama, on the other hand, was written to be heard as an auditory experience.
Watching impassively is an enormous statue of Jesus. These two examples show how without even considering the storyline we can see differences which separate the two films and while there are still a couple of big differences left there are also a few smaller changes which make a big difference.
Both films have the same words so they both do this, but it is the way the directors chose to present the prologue that is so contrasting. They also play on his exit to create an effect of realism, as if it were a real Prince.
As far as props go, there was one thing that caught my eye when watching both of the videos one right after the other.
The camera switches to Benvolio holding the gun and it switches between the two characters as they speak. The reason for this being is that I preferred the music in it which was used to fantastic effect and very well thought out. It was slightly unclear whether it was meant to be set in modern times or not.
The plot in the movies was better designed and developed by Baz Luhrmann. You could say that Baz Lurhamann has done what Shakespeare did.
One critics view was: I enjoyed watching both films and the ways the directors were able to interpret and develop the characters. The Capulets wear more sinister smart black suits and waistcoats with metal-heeled shoes, to fit in with the western music; they also have more slicked-back jet black hair.
Zeffirelli's version of the story is done in period dress, and is a filmic representation of the actual historic period during which the play was written (set in Italy, as the play is). Task: Compare and contrast the ways in which Baz Luhrmann and Franco Zeffirelli present Scene 1 of Shakespeare’s ‘Romeo and Juliet’ In this essay, I will be comparing two film versions of the famous William Shakespeare play ‘Romeo and Juliet’.
Comparison of Two Film Versions of Romeo and Juliet Shakespeare’s play ‘Romeo and Juliet’ was made into a film by two different directors. Baz Luhrmann’s to Franco Zeffirelli’s interpretation of Romeo and Juliet were very distinct and they both appeal to different age group audiences.
We will write a custom essay sample on Compare And Contrast The Two Film Versions Of Romeo And Juliet By Franco Zeffirelli And Baz Luhrmann specifically for.
Romeo and Juliet- Film Comparison Baz Luhrman and Franco Zeffirelli’s interpretations of Romeo and Juliet are both excellent films. They both capture the moments between the two star-crossed lovers of enemy houses quite well. To assess Baz Luhrmann's use of setting in his film, Romeo + Juliet, we can begin by contrasting the film with the play as it was originally performed in the 16th-century theatre.
The key difference between the manner in which the film and the play deal with location is that the film is primarily an.A comparison of juliets character in the films of franco zeffirelli and baz luhrmann